A focus on roots, localizations, usurpations, and obliterations together with commemoration and different fields of scholarly research, along with a thematic focus on Homer's Nykia, permit Hans Ruin to revisit the foundations of history in Being with the Dead. Ruin draws on cultural sociology, including the work of Alfred Schütz, as well as Heideggerian historicity and the dead of the distant past, including archaeology and ethnography, paleography and physical anthropology. Ruin also engages Michel de Certeau's Writing of History and its focus on the other in a necropolitical account tracked through interdisciplinary fields. In my reading I supplement Ruin's critical focus on Homer scholarship beyond the twentieth century with a return to Nietzsche's nineteenth‐century emphasis on the “blood” needed to bring the voices of the past to speak in his own reading of Homer. To do this, I note the dead‐silenced (“zombie”) scholarship haunting Nietzsche's voice in his field of classical philology in addition to Nietzsche's source scholarship and his hermeneutic methodology of historiographical research for the sake of ethnography, archaeology, and Nietzsche's lectures on pre‐Platonic philosophy.

中文翻译：

---

为鬼魂献血：与尼采一起阅读遗迹

将重点放在基层，本地化，强取豪夺，并obliterations与纪念和学术研究的不同领域，具有主题重点荷马的相处Nykia，允许汉斯·鲁重温历史的基础在与死者是。废墟借鉴了文化社会学，包括阿尔弗雷德·舒茨（AlfredSchütz）的著作以及海德格尔的历史性和遥远的过去，包括考古学，人种学，古地理学和自然人类学。废墟还参与了米歇尔·德·塞多（Michel de Certeau ）的历史写作并通过跨学科领域追踪其在一个非政治性账户中的重点。在我的阅读中，我补充了鲁恩对20世纪以后荷马学业的批判性关注，同时还回顾了尼采在19世纪对“血液”的强调，他需要用过去的声音来表达自己对荷马的理解。为此，除了尼采的原始研究和为了人类学，考古学以及尼采的讲学而进行的史学研究的诠释方法论之外，我注意到死寂的（“僵尸”）奖学金困扰着尼采在他的古典语言学领域的声音。柏拉图前哲学。