This review essay discusses the historical Zeitdiagnosen in recent scholarly literature, focusing in particular on Jérôme Baschet's Défaire la tyrannie du présent: Temporalités émergentes et futurs inédits (2018). Baschet's book constitutes an original contribution to ongoing debates about our temporal condition in at least three aspects. First, although relying partly on earlier theoretical literature (principally the works of François Hartog), it more significantly draws on the author's long‐term engagement with the Zapatista movement. Second, it does not confine itself merely to diagnosing our temporal situation (presentism) but proposes strategies for exiting it. And finally, Baschet's theory of temporality is one part of his far more extensive enterprise of “exiting capitalism,” a project aimed at reconceptualizing the existing foundations of Western civilization. Although previous authors have defined our contemporary regime of temporality by focusing on the present and the disappearance of the future, Baschet claims that it is more accurate to speak about a burgeoning of futures—of completely new modalities of the future that differ significantly from modernist notions of it.

中文翻译：

---

如何重温未来？

这篇评论文章讨论了最近的学术文献中的历史时代诊断，尤其着眼于杰罗姆·巴斯切特（JérômeBaschet）的《暴君的暴君》：《暂时性的未来》。（2018）。巴歇特的书至少在三个方面为正在进行的关于我们的时间状况的辩论做出了贡献。首先，尽管部分依赖早期的理论文献（主要是FrançoisHartog的著作），但更重要的是借鉴了作者与Zapatista运动的长期合作。其次，它不仅仅局限于诊断我们的时间状况（存在主义），而是提出了退出它的策略。最后，巴斯切特的时间性理论是他更为广泛的“退出资本主义”计划的一部分，该计划旨在重新概念化西方文明的现有基础。尽管以前的作者通过关注当前和未来的消失来定义了我们当代的时间性制度，