In this article, we survey a growing body of literature within geography and other intersecting fields that trains attention on what inclusive smart cities are, or what they could be. In doing so, we build on debates around smart citizens, smart public participation, and grassroots and bottom‐up smart cities that are concerned with making smart cities more inclusive. The growing critical scholarship on such discourses, however, alerts us to the knowledge politics that are involved in, and the urban inequalities that are deeply rooted within, the urban. Technological interventions contribute to these politics and inequalities in various ways. Accordingly, we discuss limitations of the current discourses around inclusive smart cities and suggest a need for a nuanced definition of ‘inclusiveness’. We also discuss the necessity to further engage with critical data studies in order to ‘know’ what we are critiquing.

中文翻译：

---

迈向更具包容性的智慧城市：调和边际数据和话语的不同现实

在本文中，我们调查了地理和其他相交领域中越来越多的文学作品，这些文学作品吸引人们关注什么是包容性智慧城市，或者它们可能是什么。在此过程中，我们以围绕智慧公民，智慧公众参与以及草根和自下而上的智慧城市的辩论为基础，这些问题与使智慧城市更具包容性有关。然而，关于这种话语的批判性学术研究不断增加，使我们意识到与之相关的知识政治以及根深蒂固于城市中的城市不平等现象。技术干预以各种方式加剧了这些政治和不平等现象。因此，我们讨论了关于包容性智慧城市的当前论述的局限性，并提出了对“包容性”的细微定义的需求。