Readers who are following gender politics in Europe and around the world will hardly have missed the rise of so-called anti-gender movements and the worries this conglomeration of right-wing populists, nationalists and conservative Christian mobilisation is causing both to larger fields of gender, feminist and women’s studies, and individual researchers. Indeed, after nearly half a century of relative success with processes of professionalisation and institutionalisation in many national contexts in Europe, gender, women’s and feminist research is under almost daily attack both onand offline in many settings. In a time marked by neoliberal economics and austerity – not to mention at the time of this writing (April 2020), a global pandemic – many critical knowledge formations are under attack, including climate research and research on racism and socioeconomic inequalities; at times, it seems, science itself is under attack. That said, it is clear that gender theory and research suggesting that gender and relations between the sexes may be historically emergent and diverse, or more than a natural complementarity there for the procreation of the species and the maintenance of the so-called ‘traditional family’, have been particularly targeted. Often framed as a defence of freedom of speech or academic freedom, or through the appropriation of critical language, anti-gender activists, writers and – yes – scholars, cunningly present themselves as the defenders of women’s rights to be feminine, or of children’s rights to their own bodies. Thus, vilifying research and education committed to scrutinising power relations, inequalities and the ongoing coercion of forcing bodies into binary and naturalised gender categories. In a growing number of settings, direct threats are made against scholars, putting them at both professional and personal risk as they do their

中文翻译：

---

（反）欧洲的性别研究和民粹主义运动

关注欧洲和世界各地性别政治的读者几乎不会错过所谓的反性别运动的兴起，以及这种右翼民粹主义者、民族主义者和保守派基督教动员的聚集正在对更大范围的性别领域造成的担忧。 、女权主义和妇女研究，以及个别研究人员。事实上，在欧洲许多国家的专业化和制度化过程中取得了近半个世纪的相对成功之后，性别、妇女和女权主义研究在许多环境中几乎每天都受到线上和线下的攻击。在一个以新自由主义经济学和紧缩为标志的时代——更不用说在撰写本文时（2020 年 4 月），一场全球大流行——许多关键的知识体系都受到攻击，包括气候研究以及种族主义和社会经济不平等的研究；有时，科学本身似乎受到攻击。也就是说，很明显，性别理论和研究表明，性别和两性之间的关系在历史上可能是新兴的和多样化的，或者不仅仅是物种繁衍和所谓“传统家庭”的维持的自然互补。 '，特别有针对性。反性别活动家、作家和（是的）学者经常被视为捍卫言论自由或学术自由，或通过挪用批判性语言，狡猾地将自己塑造成女性权利或儿童权利的捍卫者到他们自己的身体。因此，诋毁致力于审查权力关系的研究和教育，不平等和持续强迫身体进入二元和归化的性别类别。在越来越多的情况下，学者受到直接威胁，使他们在工作时面临职业和个人风险