Processes of norm localisation play a crucial role in shaping the extent to which global governance norms are institutionalised at national and sub‐national levels. This article explores the politics of norm localisation through an empirical investigation of how global norms of “transparency” were localised in sub‐national processes of extractive industry governance in Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Previous theories of localisation have emphasised “constructivist” dynamics through which patterns of norm localisation are shaped decisively by efforts to build normative or cognitive congruence with local ideas and identities. In contrast, the mix of a newly democratised environment, the persistent power of corporatist elite networks and a populist style of local politics prevailing in Bojonegoro have diminished the significance of such constructivist dynamics as a basis for explaining varied patterns of norm localisation. Instead, patterns of norm localisation have depended crucially on the capacity of local political leaders to harness global governance norms instrumentally as a basis for consolidating and strengthening their own local power base. These findings have important implications for both theoretical and practical understandings of how global norm localisation processes vary in response to the contrasting political contexts in which global governance norms targeting the extractive sector are implemented.

中文翻译：

---

当全球规范遇到地方政治时：采掘业治理的本地化透明

规范本地化的过程在确定全球治理规范在国家和国家以下各级的制度化程度方面起着至关重要的作用。本文通过对印度尼西亚Bojonegoro采掘业治理的次国家级流程中如何将“透明度”的全球规范本地化的实证研究，探索了规范本地化的政治。以前的本地化理论已经强调了“建构主义”的动态，通过这种动态，努力通过建立与本地思想和身份的规范或认知一致性来决定性地形成规范本地化的模式。相反，新近民主化的环境混合在一起，社团主义精英网络的持久力量和在博霍内哥罗盛行的民粹主义地方政治风格，已经削弱了这种建构主义动力的重要性，以此作为解释各种规范本地化模式的基础。取而代之的是，规范本地化的模式主要取决于当地政治领导人利用工具有效利用全球治理规范作为巩固和加强其自身地方权力基础的基础的能力。这些发现对于理论和实践的理解都具有重要的意义，即对全球规范本地化过程如何响应于针对采掘业实施全球治理规范的不同政治背景作出反应的理解。规范本地化的模式主要取决于当地政治领导人以工具方式利用全球治理规范的能力，以此作为巩固和加强自身地方权力基础的基础。这些发现对于理论和实践的理解都具有重要的意义，即对全球规范本地化过程如何响应于针对采掘业实施全球治理规范的不同政治背景作出反应的理解。规范本地化的模式主要取决于当地政治领导人以工具方式利用全球治理规范的能力，以此作为巩固和加强自身地方权力基础的基础。这些发现对于理论和实践的理解都具有重要的意义，即对全球规范本地化过程如何响应于针对采掘业实施全球治理规范的不同政治背景作出反应的理解。