Discussions of good governance often highlight the definitional ambiguity associated with the concept. Recent scholarship on governance is beginning to emphasize the need for more context‐specific interpretations of good governance. Specifically, the literature draws on Douglass North’s institutional framework, but without paying enough attention to the role of “informal constraints.” This article seeks to address this gap by drawing on primary data.

中文翻译：

---

重新考虑澳大利亚对缅甸的援助计划：善政和“非正式约束”

关于善治的讨论经常强调与该概念相关的定义上的歧义。最近关于治理的学术研究开始强调对善治需要更多针对具体情况的解释。具体而言，文献借鉴了道格拉斯·诺斯（Douglass North）的制度框架，但没有充分注意“非正式约束”的作用。本文力图通过利用原始数据来弥补这一差距。