当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asia Pacific Viewpoint › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Looking back on development and disaster‐related displacement and resettlement, anticipating climate‐related displacement in the Asia Pacific region
Asia Pacific Viewpoint ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-08-12 , DOI: 10.1111/apv.12224
Susanna Price 1
Affiliation  

The realisation that climate change might necessitate resettlement of people displaced initially raised interest in the experience of development‐forced displacement and resettlement (DFDR). Looking back, in 1980 the first international policy on involuntary resettlement was approved to address perceived weaknesses in state property and expropriation law to safeguard people in the way of development projects. Since then international policy and praxis have brought global attention to developmentally displaced people but have not guaranteed them an effective safeguard. Recently, renewed attention has focussed on state legal and governance frameworks substantively and procedurally. Identifying four key policy objectives that resonate with climate change displacement I analyse their treatment in a data base of DFDR laws and regulations from 40 Asia Pacific states. This analysis finds overall little legal congruence. Innovative new formulations in some Asian state laws address recent public criticisms and research findings, but mostly are yet to demonstrate positive outcomes for displaced people. Pacific states increasingly abandon expropriation law to negotiate lease terms for public infrastructure projects with customary landowners that do not extinguish customary title. Any laws governing climate change relocations must protect rights, livelihoods, well‐being, inclusive decision‐making and community initiatives with procedures whilst not relinquishing climate‐change‐reducing action.

中文翻译:

回顾发展与灾害相关的流离失所和重新安置,预测亚太地区与气候有关的流离失所

气候变化最初可能需要重新安置流离失所者的认识引起了人们对发展迫迁和重新安置(DFDR)的经验的兴趣。回顾一下,1980年,第一个国际非自愿移民政策被批准,以解决国家财产和征收法中的弱点,以发展项目的方式保护人民。自那时以来,国际政策和实践引起了全球对发展中流离失所者的关注,但并不能保证他们得到有效的保障。近来,新的注意力已经集中在实质性和程序性的州法律和治理框架上。确定了与气候变化位移相关的四个关键政策目标,我在来自40个亚太州的DFDR法律和法规数据库中分析了它们的处理方式。该分析发现总体上法律上的一致性很小。亚洲一些州法律中的创新性新规定解决了最近的公众批评和研究发现,但大多数尚未证明对流离失所者具有积极的作用。太平洋州越来越多地放弃征收法,与不消灭习惯所有权的习惯土地所有者就公共基础设施项目的租赁条款进行谈判。任何有关气候变化搬迁的法律都必须通过程序保护权利,生计,福祉,包容性决策和社区倡议,同时不得放弃减少气候变化的行动。该分析发现总体上法律上的一致性很小。亚洲一些州法律中的创新性新规定解决了最近的公众批评和研究发现,但大多数尚未证明对流离失所者具有积极的作用。太平洋州越来越多地放弃征收法,与不消灭习惯所有权的习惯土地所有者就公共基础设施项目的租赁条款进行谈判。任何有关气候变化搬迁的法律都必须通过程序保护权利,生计,福祉,包容性决策和社区倡议,同时不得放弃减少气候变化的行动。该分析发现总体上法律上的一致性很小。亚洲一些州法律中的创新性新规定解决了最近的公众批评和研究发现,但大多数尚未证明对流离失所者具有积极的作用。太平洋州越来越多地放弃征收法,与不消灭习惯所有权的习惯土地所有者就公共基础设施项目的租赁条款进行谈判。任何有关气候变化搬迁的法律都必须通过程序保护权利,生计,福祉,包容性决策和社区倡议,同时不得放弃减少气候变化的行动。太平洋州越来越多地放弃征收法,与不消灭习惯所有权的习惯土地所有者就公共基础设施项目的租赁条款进行谈判。任何有关气候变化搬迁的法律都必须通过程序保护权利,生计,福祉,包容性决策和社区倡议,同时不得放弃减少气候变化的行动。太平洋州越来越多地放弃征收法,与不消灭习惯所有权的习惯土地所有者就公共基础设施项目的租赁条款进行谈判。任何有关气候变化搬迁的法律都必须通过程序保护权利,生计,福祉,包容性决策和社区倡议,同时不得放弃减少气候变化的行动。
更新日期:2019-08-12
down
wechat
bug