当前位置: X-MOL 学术Youth Justice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Pranks’ and misjudgment with lethal or highly destructive consequences: Towards a principled approach in sentencing youthful folly
Youth Justice ( IF 1.412 ) Pub Date : 2019-04-01 , DOI: 10.1177/1473225419840577
Nigel Stone

Previous commentaries (Stone, 2017a, 2017b) have sought to anticipate the application of the Sentencing Council’s (2017) Definitive Guideline on Sentencing Children and Young People that came into effect from 1 June 2017. It is now possible to gain some appreciation of the Guideline’s impact in light of recent appeal judgements in cases where first trial hearing was conducted and after that the qualifying date, and the sentencers concerned were thus required (by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 s. 125(1)) to follow that guidance. These judgements have featured instances of youthful misconduct where the harm dimension was very significant – either by causing death or huge financial loss, in each instance by fire – but the perpetrator’s culpability was significantly less so, particularly having regard to their age and stage of developmental maturation.

中文翻译:

具有致命或高度破坏性后果的“恶作剧”和误判:在量刑青年愚蠢行为方面采取有原则的方法

之前的评论(斯通,2017a,2017b)试图预测量刑委员会(2017)于 2017 年 6 月 1 日生效的儿童和青少年量刑权威指南的应用。现在可以对该指南的鉴于最近在进行初审听证会和此后的合格日期的案件中的上诉判决的影响,因此(根据 2009 年《死因裁判官和司法法》第 125(1)条)要求相关判刑者遵循该指导。这些判决的特点是青少年不当行为的实例,其中伤害维度非常重要——无论是造成死亡还是巨大的经济损失,在每种情况下都是火灾——但肇事者的罪责要小得多,
更新日期:2019-04-01
down
wechat
bug