The author compares the migration policies of the Czech Republic and Slovakia since 1993, including both immigration as well as integration. The text focuses mainly on the autochthonous policies of both countries in regards to labor migration as the main type of migration. Significant immigration is a recent phenomenon in both the Czech Republic as well as Slovakia and neither immigration, nor integration policy belong among the priorities of either state. The Czech Republic seems to be more mature in adopting regulations for better access of foreigners to the labor market. However, when comparing the Czech Republic with the rest of Europe, it belongs to the most restrictive countries in terms of integration as well as in terms of immigration. Given the extremely low ratio of non-EU born adults becoming Czech citizens, the Czech Republic will remain an exclusionary democracy unless it changes either the voting rights or increases the naturalization rates by reducing the conditions for foreigners. Quite interestingly, even though Slovakia lags behind the Czech Republic in terms of integration policies and naturalization rates, it is more inclusive in terms of political rights.

中文翻译：

---

自1989年以来捷克和斯洛伐克共和国的移民政策-是限制性的，自由的，一体化的还是循环的？

作者比较了自1993年以来捷克共和国和斯洛伐克的移民政策，包括移民和融合。案文主要侧重于两国有关劳务移民作为主要移民类型的自治政策。在捷克共和国和斯洛伐克，最近都有大批移民现象出现，无论是移民还是融合政策都不是两国的优先事项。捷克共和国似乎在通过法规以使外国人更好地进入劳动力市场方面更加成熟。但是，将捷克共和国与欧洲其他国家进行比较时，就融合和移民而言，它属于限制性最强的国家。由于非欧盟出生的成年人成为捷克公民的比例非常低，捷克共和国将继续是排他性民主国家，除非它通过减少外国人的条件改变投票权或提高入籍率。有趣的是，尽管斯洛伐克在融合政策和入籍率方面落后于捷克共和国，但在政治权利方面却更具包容性。