This article explores the recent controversy over the American Library Association’s poster for Banned Books Week. In particular, this article connects the 2015 controversy to broader historical issues and tensions within American librarianship concerning social responsibilities. The researchers used a qualitative approach, conducting telephone interviews with 26 individuals. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed deductively. The interviews revealed deep continuing tensions regarding American librarianship’s relationship to responsibilities. First, there is some dissatisfaction with the American Library Association and its Office for Intellectual Freedom. Second, there are competing conceptualizations of censorship and how to apply these differing meanings while remaining socially responsible. Third, there is uncertainty about how to appropriately act as an ally, within librarianship, to marginalized peoples.

中文翻译：

---

社会责任，图书馆事业和ALA：2015年禁书周海报争议

本文探讨了最近关于美国图书馆协会的“禁书周”海报的争议。尤其是，本文将2015年的争议与更广泛的历史问题和美国图书馆事业中有关社会责任的紧张关系联系起来。研究人员采用定性方法，对26个人进行了电话采访。访谈记录，转录和演绎分析。采访显示，关于美国图书馆事业与责任关系的持续紧张关系。首先，人们对美国图书馆协会及其知识自由办公室不满意。其次，存在着相互竞争的审查制度概念，以及如何在保持社会责任感的同时运用这些不同的含义。第三，