Based empirically on a netnography of public forums related to news articles about car–bike conflicts and accidents on Melbourne’s roads, this article takes classic anthropological and sociological theory on ethnicity and mobility, respectively, into the new territory of explaining the mutual perceptions of drivers and cyclists. Furthermore, moving from ethnicity, we invoke multiculturalism in its senses as a descriptor for ethnic pluralism, a discourse of marginalisation, and a basis for a politics of recognition. Through this we argue for reconceptualisation of the road as ‘multiautocultural’—a space comprised of a plurality of modally contrived and mutually othering vehicular identities and cultures that, like ethnicities in multicultural societies, ought to be appreciated as such in law, education and road design if, as we argue, amelioration of conflict on the roads is to be mitigated.

中文翻译：

---

多元自动文化主义：重新定义道路冲突

基于经验的公共论坛网络，有关墨尔本道路上发生的有关摩托车冲突和交通事故的新闻报道，本文将有关种族和机动性的经典人类学和社会学理论分别带入了新的领域，以解释驾驶员和驾驶员之间的相互看法。骑自行车的人。此外，从种族出发，我们将多元文化主义称为种族多元主义的描述，边缘化的话语和承认政治的基础。通过这种方式，我们主张将道路重新概念化为“多元自动文化”，即一个由多种模样的，相互依存的车辆身份和文化组成的空间，就像多元文化社会中的种族一样，在法律，教育和道路方面也应受到赞赏。如我们所述设计