:Recently, republicans have been increasingly arguing that the ideal of nondomination can ground both a more plausible account of global justice and better insights for global institutional design than liberal egalitarianism does. What kind of global institutions, however, does nondomination require? The essay argues that a global institutional blueprint based on the republican ideal of nondomination is a multifaceted endeavor. Republican institutions should aim to fulfill three different desiderata: 1) avoiding excessive concentration of power; 2) bringing informal asymmetrical power under institutional control; 3) furthering an active, vigilant citizenry. The three desiderata often pull in different directions. At the global level in particular, they do not converge on a verdict over whether we should switch to a cosmopolitan institutional order, stick to a world of states, or opt for something altogether different. As a result, there is no straightforward pathway leading from the vindication of nondomination as the central principle of global justice to a clear vision for a global institutional order. The issue is, instead, a matter of careful balancing.

中文翻译：

---

共和主义与全球制度：紧张的三个愿望

: 最近，共和党人越来越多地争辩说，与自由平等主义相比，非统治的理想既可以为全球正义提供更合理的解释，也可以为全球制度设计提供更好的见解。然而，非支配性需要什么样的全球机构？这篇文章认为，基于共和主义的非统治理想的全球制度蓝图是一项多方面的努力。共和机构应致力于实现三个不同的要求：1）避免权力过度集中；2）将非正式的不对称权力置于制度控制之下；3) 促进积极、警惕的公民。三者往往拉向不同的方向。特别是在全球层面，他们并没有就我们是否应该转向世界性的制度秩序达成一致意见，坚持一个国家的世界，或者选择完全不同的东西。因此，没有直接的途径可以从证明非统治作为全球正义的核心原则到明确的全球制度秩序愿景。相反，问题在于仔细平衡。