:Self-ownership theorists argue that many of our most morally urgent and enforceable rights stem from the fact that we own ourselves. Critics of self-ownership argue that the claim that people own their bodies commits self-ownership theorists to several implausible conclusions because self-ownership theory relies on several vague moral predicates, and any precisification of the required predicates is seemingly too permissive (because it allows people to impose deadly risks on innocent bystanders for no reason) or too restrictive (because it prohibits people from polluting or even interacting with others at all). I argue that this line of criticism does not undermine the case for self-ownership theory because self-ownership theory does not require precisification of each moral concept that it is based on and, even if it did, the theory’s alleged extensional inadequacy does not undermine its justification.

中文翻译：

---

边界问题和自我所有权

: 自我所有权理论家认为，我们许多在道德上最紧迫和可执行的权利源于我们拥有自己的事实。自我所有权的批评者认为，人们拥有自己的身体的主张使自我所有权理论家得出了几个令人难以置信的结论，因为自我所有权理论依赖于几个模糊的道德谓词，并且对所需谓词的任何精确化似乎都过于宽容（因为它允许人们无缘无故地对无辜的旁观者施加致命的风险）或过于严格（因为它完全禁止人们污染甚至与他人互动）。我认为这种批评并没有破坏自我所有权理论的理由，因为自我所有权理论不需要精确化它所基于的每个道德概念，即使它确实如此，