当前位置: X-MOL 学术Slavic Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Experience as Device: Encountering Russian Formalism in the Ljubljana School
Slavic Review ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-11 , DOI: 10.1017/slr.2020.11
Kaitlyn Tucker Sorenson

Russian Formalism and the Ljubljana School are two of the most influential Slavic contributions to global critical theory. Yet, cast as the prolegomena and coda of the short twentieth century's groundswell of critical theory, these two theoretical movements are rarely considered in tandem. This article seeks to challenge that perception on both historical and theoretical grounds. It begins by documenting the introduction of Russian Formalism to Slovene literary criticism, and then traces how the early Ljubljana School, while developing its own theoretical platform, was exposed to certain Formalist principles. After chronicling this historical encounter, the article concludes by considering how these two strains of Slavic critical theory might most productively intertwine, and proposes new ways of encountering Russian Formalism in the Ljubljana School.

中文翻译:

作为装置的体验:在卢布尔雅那学派遭遇俄罗斯形式主义

俄罗斯形式主义和卢布尔雅那学派是斯拉夫对全​​球批判理论最有影响力的两个贡献。然而,作为短短 20 世纪批判理论风潮的序幕和尾声,这两个理论运动很少被同时考虑。本文试图从历史和理论基础上挑战这种看法。它首先记录了俄罗斯形式主义对斯洛文尼亚文学批评的介绍,然后追溯了早期的卢布尔雅那学派在发展自己的理论平台的同时如何接触到某些形式主义原则。在记录了这次历史遭遇之后,文章最后考虑了这两种斯拉夫批判理论如何最有效地交织在一起,
更新日期:2020-05-11
down
wechat
bug