:The regulation of poor migrants increasingly became a problem for local governments in eighteenth-century West Flanders and Flandres Maritime. Conflicts arose about which parish migrants should address for requesting poor relief. Migrants moreover physically moved over the boundaries of the different national French and Flemish legislative systems. This article will analyse how local parishes dealt with these problems in practice by focusing on a local agreement: the Concordat of Ypres of 1750. This Concordat offers an abundance of archival material and provides a unique insight into the practices of settlement and poor relief in continental Ancien Régime Europe. The aim of the article is to understand how out-parish relief functioned within the agreement. With that aim in mind, I will analyse, inter alia, the micro practices of how out-parish relief was paid (for example, removal or out-parish relief), how it reached the poor and, more importantly, how the number, expenses on and spread of out-parish poor evolved through the years. This article strengthens the claim that extensive relief practices were not unique to England and Wales. It also provides further insights into the relations between rural and urban areas (as most migration and settlement literature had either an urban or a rural focus) and sheds light on the differences of interests between local and central administrations.

中文翻译：

---

管理边境地区的贫困移民：布尔斯坎普教区外救济的微观历史（1768-96）

: 对贫困移民的监管日益成为 18 世纪西佛兰德斯和佛兰德斯海事的地方政府的问题。关于哪些教区移民应该解决请求救济差的问题，出现了冲突。此外，移民实际上跨越了不同国家的法国和佛兰德立法体系的边界。本文将通过关注当地协议来分析当地教区如何在实践中处理这些问题：1750 年的伊普尔协欧洲旧制度。本文的目的是了解教区外救济如何在协议中发挥作用。考虑到这一目标，我将分析，除其他外，教区外救济的支付方式（例如，搬迁或教区外救济）的微观实践，它如何到达穷人，更重要的是，教区外穷人的数量、费用和分布如何多年来演变. 本文强化了广泛的救济实践并非英格兰和威尔士独有的主张。它还提供了对农村和城市地区之间关系的进一步见解（因为大多数移民和定居文献都以城市或农村为重点），并阐明了地方和中央政府之间的利益差异。本文强化了广泛的救济实践并非英格兰和威尔士独有的主张。它还提供了对农村和城市地区之间关系的进一步见解（因为大多数移民和定居文献都以城市或农村为重点），并阐明了地方和中央政府之间的利益差异。本文强化了广泛的救济实践并非英格兰和威尔士独有的主张。它还提供了对农村和城市地区之间关系的进一步见解（因为大多数移民和定居文献都以城市或农村为重点），并阐明了地方和中央政府之间的利益差异。