当前位置: X-MOL 学术Review of International Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Returning to the root: Radical feminist thought and feminist theories of International Relations
Review of International Studies ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-04 , DOI: 10.1017/s0260210520000133
David Duriesmith , Sara Meger

Feminist International Relations (IR) theory is haunted by a radical feminist ghost. From Enloe's suggestion that the personal is both political and international, often seen as the foundation of feminist IR, feminist IR scholarship has been built on the intellectual contributions of a body of theory it has long left for dead. Though Enloe's sentiment directly references the Hanisch's radical feminist rallying call, there is little direct engagement with the radical feminist thinkers who popularised the sentiment in IR. Rather, since its inception, the field has been built on radical feminist thought it has left for dead. This has left feminist IR troubled by its radical feminist roots and the conceptual baggage that feminist IR has unreflectively carried from second-wave feminism into its contemporary scholarship. By returning to the roots of radical feminism we believe IR can gain valuable insights regarding the system of sex-class oppression, the central role of heterosexuality in maintaining this system, and the feminist case for revolutionary political action in order to dismantle it.

中文翻译:

回归本源:激进的女权主义思想与国际关系中的女权主义理论

女权主义国际关系(IR)理论被激进的女权主义幽灵所困扰。根据 Enloe 的建议,即个人既是政治性的又是国际性的,通常被视为女权主义国际关系的基础,女权主义国际关系学术是建立在长期以来一直处于死亡状态的理论体系的智力贡献之上的。虽然 Enloe 的情绪直接引用了 Hanisch 激进的女权主义号召,但与在 IR 中推广这种情绪的激进女权主义思想家几乎没有直接接触。相反,从一开始,这个领域就建立在激进的女权主义思想之上,它已经死了。这让女权主义国际关系因其激进的女权主义根源以及女权主义国际关系不加思考地将第二波女权主义带入其当代学术研究的概念包袱而感到困扰。
更新日期:2020-05-04
down
wechat
bug