当前位置: X-MOL 学术Reference Services Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Researching Bears Ears: reference practice for civic engagement
Reference Services Review ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-10 , DOI: 10.1108/rsr-09-2019-0061
Amy Brunvand

The purpose of this study is to describe practical, generalizable competencies for reference librarians to promote civic engagement and social justice while assisting with politicized queries.,Working through an example of tension between land development and protection of an indigenous sacred place illustrates reference strategies that model an ideally inclusive community dialogue.,To promote civic engagement, librarians have a role to teach basic civics and to help identify opportunities for public comments and other “leverage points” in a system. An information trail for civic engagement is generated though an interaction between government planning, industry lobbying and citizen activism; it is supported by online and gray literature sources that typically fall outside of typical library collections and databases. A way to grapple with contentious and distorting political claims is to model ideal stakeholder inclusivity, a strategy that also helps to bring marginalized voices into the civic dialogue. Sources from the humanities express cultural and spiritual considerations that are absent from typical political discourse.,Strategies are based on experience as a staff writer for a community magazine.,Specific strategies and competencies promote civic engagement during the time period allowed by a typical extended reference dialogue.,An overly sunny view of community problem-solving glosses over some messy realities. To promote civic engagement, librarians must develop competencies to help citizens grapple with marginalization and distorting claims.,Calls to promote civic engagement and social justice in libraries require librarians to develop new competencies. Working through a case study illustrates specific knowledge and reference practices that support strong democracy.

中文翻译:

研究熊耳:公民参与的参考实践

这项研究的目的是描述参考图书馆员在促进政治参与和查询的同时,促进公民参与和社会正义的实用,可概括的能力。理想的包容性社区对话。为了促进公民参与,图书馆员应承担教基础公民的角色,并帮助确定系统中公众意见和其他“杠杆点”的机会。通过政府计划,行业游说和公民行动之间的互动,产生了公民参与的信息线索。它由通常不属于典型图书馆馆藏和数据库的在线和灰色文献资源提供支持。应对有争议和扭曲的政治主张的一种方法是对理想的利益相关者的包容性进行建模,该策略还有助于将边缘化的声音带入公民对话。人文方面的资料表达了典型的政治话语所缺乏的文化和精神考虑。策略是基于作为社区杂志的撰稿人的经验而制定的。特定的策略和能力在典型的扩展参考范围内可促进公民参与对话。在一些凌乱的现实中,社区解决问题的观点过于乐观。为了促进公民参与,图书馆员必​​须发展能力,以帮助公民应对边缘化和歪曲主张的问题。呼吁在图书馆促进公民参与和社会正义的呼声要求图书馆员发展新的能力。通过案例研究可以说明支持强大民主的特定知识和参考做法。
更新日期:2020-02-10
down
wechat
bug