Abstract:Both commercial and noncommercial publishing have impacted interlibrary loan and other types of resource sharing, such as patrondriven systems, in a variety of ways. Interlibrary loan has always been a concern of publishers, with the possibility libraries would copy in "such aggregate quantities as to substitute for a subscription to or purchase" of a work (CONTU 1978). Exceptions and limits have been in place in the law and as guidelines for library copying for patrons and interlibrary loan since 1978. However, over the past five decades or so, as traditional print publications, electronic "Big Deals," licensing, and permissions have become increasingly unsustainable for library budgets, the open access (OA) movement has gained acceptance and has influenced resource sharing as well. OA materials are being used to fulfill resource-sharing requests, and researcher behavior may bypass traditional means of resource sharing altogether for greater speed and ease of access. Traditional publishing has found itself at a crossroads with the need to adapt as researchers increasingly accept new models of scholarly communication. There are plenty of moving parts in resource sharing today, and these are explored herein.

中文翻译：

---

高校图书馆背景下资源共享，学术交流和出版者角色的发展

摘要：商业出版和非商业出版都以各种方式影响着馆际互借和其他类型的资源共享，例如顾客驱动的系统。馆际互借一直是出版商关注的问题，图书馆有可能以“总数量代替出版物的订购或购买”的形式进行复制（CONTU 1978）。自1978年以来，法律就已经有例外和限制，并作为读者和图书馆间借阅的图书馆复制指南。但是，在过去的大约五十年中，随着传统的印刷出版物，电子“大交易”，许可和许可的出现，图书馆预算变得越来越难以为继，开放存取（OA）运动获得了认可，并影响了资源共享。OA材料用于满足资源共享的要求，研究人员的行为可能会完全绕过传统的资源共享方式，以提高速度和访问的便利性。随着研究人员越来越多地接受新的学术交流模式，传统出版业已处于适应变革的十字路口。如今，资源共享中有很多活动的部分，本文将对此进行探讨。