Objective Institutional repositories are platforms for presenting and publicizing scholarly output that might not be suitable to publish in a peer-reviewed journal or that must meet open access requirements. However, there are many challenges associated with their launch and up-keep. The objective of this systematic review was to define the impacts of institutional repositories (IRs) on an academic institution, thus justifying their implementation and/or maintenance. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (Wiley), ERIC (ProQuest), Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus (Elsevier), and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (EBSCO). A total of 6,593 citations were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Thirteen included studies were divided into 3 areas of impact: citation count, exposure or presence, and administrative impact. Those focusing on citation count (n=5) and exposure or presence (n=7) demonstrated positive impacts of IRs on institutions and researchers. One study focusing on administrative benefit demonstrated the utility of IRs in automated population of ORCID profiles. Conclusion Based on the available literature, IRs appear to have a positive impact on citation count, exposure or presence, and administrative burden. To draw stronger conclusions, more and higher-quality studies are needed.

中文翻译：

---

机构知识库的影响：系统回顾


客观机构存储库是展示和宣传学术成果的平台，这些成果可能不适合在同行评审的期刊上发表或必须满足开放获取要求。然而，它们的启动和维护存在许多挑战。本次系统审查的目的是确定机构存储库 (IR) 对学术机构的影响，从而证明其实施和/或维护的合理性。方法 在以下数据库中进行全面的文献检索：Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane Library (Wiley)、ERIC (ProQuest)、Web of Science (Core Collection)、Scopus (Elsevier) 和 Library, Information Science & Technology摘要（EBSCO）。根据预定义的纳入和排除标准筛选了总共 6,593 条引用。结果 13 项纳入的研究分为 3 个影响领域：引用计数、曝光或存在以及管理影响。那些关注引用计数 (n=5) 和曝光或存在 (n=7) 的人证明了 IR 对机构和研究人员的积极影响。一项关注管理效益的研究证明了 IR 在 ORCID 配置文件自动填充中的实用性。结论 根据现有文献，IR 似乎对引用计数、曝光或存在以及管理负担具有积极影响。为了得出更有力的结论，需要更多、更高质量的研究。