A growing number of studies argue that the Ottomans became militantly Sunni in the sixteenth century as they participated in the age of confessionalization. In defining Ottoman Sunnism, state policy and state-appointed jurists and scholars played a significant role. This paper attempts to define Ottoman Sunnism in the sixteenth century in a manner subtly different from that of the jurists, by looking at the views of Ottoman historians on the issues that divided the original Muslim community, ultimately resulting in the Sunni-Shiʿi schism. Despite the seemingly sectarian conflicts of the sixteenth century, neither rigid Sunnism nor fierce confessionalization was carried over into the intellectual and cultural scene. A moderate inclination towards Shiʿism/ʿAlidism and strong attachment to Ahl al-Bayt continued to be potent forces in Sunni Ottoman intellectual circles.

中文翻译：

---

对奥斯曼帝国逊尼主义的质疑：十六世纪奥斯曼文学和历史写作中对伊斯兰历史和阿尔拜耳主义的侵占

越来越多的研究认为，奥斯曼帝国在16世纪参与as悔时代的时代就变成了逊尼派武装。在定义奥斯曼帝国主义时，国家政策和国家任命的法学家和学者发挥了重要作用。本文试图通过观察奥斯曼历史学家对分裂原始穆斯林社区的问题的看法，以一种不同于法学家的方式来定义十六世纪的奥斯曼逊尼派主义，最终导致逊尼派-什叶派分裂。尽管16世纪看似宗派主义的冲突，僵化的逊尼派主义和激烈的悔都没有被带入知识分子和文化领域。