According to the fair play defense of political obligations citizens have a reciprocity-based duty to share the costs involved in the production of public goods. But sometimes, states produce collective goods through wrongdoing. For example, sometimes states’ wrongful immigration policies can contribute to the welfare of their own populations. Do citizens have duties of reciprocity in light of such wrongful benefits? I argue that the answer to this question is negative. Drawing on the observation that beneficiaries of wrongdoing incur compensatory duties to the victims of that wrongdoing, I argue that, rather than having a duty of reciprocity for wrongful benefits, citizens have a duty to disgorge the benefits in compensation. Furthermore, the fair play defense of political obligations entails that citizens can be justified in disobeying the law in order to comply with their compensatory duties to victims of their state’s wrongdoing.

中文翻译：

---

公平竞争和不正当利益

根据对政治义务的公平竞争辩护，公民有基于互惠的义务来分担公共产品生产所涉及的成本。但有时，国家通过不法行为生产集体商品。例如，有时各州错误的移民政策会为其本国人民的福利做出贡献。鉴于这种不正当利益，公民是否有互惠义务？我认为这个问题的答案是否定的。根据不法行为的受益人对该不法行为的受害者承担赔偿义务的观察，我认为，公民有​​义务交出赔偿利益，而不是对不法利益承担互惠义务。此外，