当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of East Asian Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
REPUTATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM THE US AND SOUTH KOREA
Journal of East Asian Studies ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-23 , DOI: 10.1017/jea.2019.20
Matthew Dale Kim

Past studies suggest that domestic public support for compliance with international human rights law can constrain governments to comply with human rights law. But the question remains: Why does the public care about compliance? Using a series of survey experiments in South Korea and the United States, this study finds that constituents are concerned about compliance in one issue area—such as human rights—because they believe it will affect the country's reputation in other domains of international law. Cross-national survey experiments demonstrate that past noncompliance negatively affects the South Korean public's second-order beliefs about the likelihood of future compliance across different issue areas. However, past noncompliance has a limited impact on the US public's first-order beliefs across different domains.

中文翻译:

声誉和遵守国际人权法:来自美国和韩国的实验证据

过去的研究表明,国内公众对遵守国际人权法的支持可能会限制政府遵守人权法。但问题仍然存在:为什么公众关心合规性?通过在韩国和美国进行的一系列调查实验,本研究发现三方成员关注一个问题领域(例如人权)的合规性,因为他们认为这会影响该国在其他国际法领域的声誉。跨国调查实验表明,过去的不合规行为会对韩国公众对未来跨不同问题领域合规可能性的二阶信念产生负面影响。然而,过去的违规行为对美国公众在不同领域的一阶信念影响有限。
更新日期:2019-07-23
down
wechat
bug