South Korea is the only nation to become an important donor nation after being a recipient of Official Development Assistance (ODA) for several decades. In 2010, it became a member of the OECD's Development Assistance Committee, and while it has continued to use its experience as a former ODA recipient to inform its distribution practices, it also has evolved its ODA policies in response to changes in international norms and the imperatives associated with being a DAC-member nation. We know that, while policies may change, actual ODA disbursements—which nations are selected as recipients and receive ODA in what amounts—may lag or even remain unchanged. In this paper, we use the case of South Korea to determine how actual ODA disbursements change in response to policy changes. To accomplish this, we use a selection model to conduct a statistical analysis of South Korea's ODA disbursements using dyadic data from 1987 to 2016. Our results indicate that, while there has been continuity in terms of which nations receive South Korean ODA, there were also notable changes in its disbursements. Specifically, the ODA policy changes the South Korean government enacted did result in an altered profile of nations that were targeted by South Korea as ODA recipients.

中文翻译：

---

官方发展援助支付的政策和实践：对韩国官方发展援助变化的分析

韩国是唯一一个在接受官方发展援助（ODA）几十年后成为重要捐助国的国家。2010 年，它成为经合组织发展援助​​委员会的成员，在继续利用其作为前官方发展援助受援国的经验为其分配实践提供信息的同时，它还根据国际规范和成为 DAC 成员国的必要条件。我们知道，虽然政策可能会发生变化，但实际的官方发展援助支出——哪些国家被选为受援国以及接受官方发展援助的金额——可能会滞后甚至保持不变。在本文中，我们以韩国为例来确定实际的官方发展援助支出如何随着政策变化而变化。要做到这一点，我们使用选择模型，使用 1987 年至 2016 年的二元数据对韩国的 ODA 支出进行了统计分析。我们的结果表明，虽然在哪些国家接受韩国 ODA 方面存在连续性，但其在接受韩国 ODA 方面也存在显着变化。付款。具体而言，韩国政府颁布的官方发展援助政策改变确实导致韩国作为官方发展援助接受国的目标国家的形象发生了变化。