The year 2015 marked the fifteenth anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women and Peace and Security. This article analyzes the marginalization of the resolution’s prevention mandate in the theoretical and policy literatures. Our feminist analysis reveals that shortcomings in the policy arena are foreshadowed in conflict prevention scholarship. Conflict prevention research under-theorizes gender drivers of conflict, focusing excessively on cause/effect links at the expense of (gendered) structures of signification that make violence possible. Mirroring these gaps, the implementation of the conflict prevention mandate of 1325 fails to confront the war system and gendered forms of militarism and militarization. Nevertheless, the work of agencies and organizations outside the Security Council presents opportunities for long-term and systemic social transformation. We suggest that advancements in the protection and participation aspects of 1325 can strengthen its prevention mandate because together these provisions challenge the gender norms that are implicated in the occurrence, justification, and sustenance of violent conflicts.

中文翻译：

---

1325 Pod中最弱的“ P”？通过安全理事会第1325号决议实现预防冲突

2015年是联合国安全理事会关于妇女与和平与安全的第1325（2000）号决议通过十五周年。本文分析了理论和政策文献中该决议的预防任务的边缘化。我们的女权主义分析表明，预防冲突奖学金预示了政策领域的缺陷。预防冲突研究对冲突的性别驱动因素缺乏理论依据，过度关注因果关系，而以（性别）表示暴力的符号结构为代价。反映了这些差距，执行1325年预防冲突授权未能面对战争系统以及军国主义和军事化的性别形式。不过，安全理事会以外机构和组织的工作为长期和系统的社会变革提供了机会。我们建议，在1325年的保护和参与方面取得进展可以加强其预防任务，因为这些规定共同挑战了暴力冲突的发生，理由和维持所涉及的性别规范。