This essay discusses the three most recent posthumous publications of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. With the 2019 release of Classification Struggles, coming after On the State (2014) and Manet (2017), and covering Bourdieu’s first lectures as the Chair in Sociology at the Collège de France from 1981 to 1982, this emerging oral tradition marks an opportune moment to re-examine Bourdieu’s oeuvre in light of a mode of presentation and knowledge transference that is unprecedented in scope within the sociological canon. Taken together, these series of lectures, but also notes, essays by his collaborators, and even an unfinished book length manuscript, constitute a fascinating process of analysis of the wide range of topics that Bourdieu tackled throughout his career. As such, these works lend important insights that should aid readers in re-evaluating Bourdieu’s more polished works. However, beyond the additional insights that may lead international sociologists to a more thorough understanding of Bourdieu’s best-known theories, one finds, when examined chronologically, the slow march of Bourdieu’s progress towards a fully-fledged theory of the state, a topic that he did not begin to formally analyze until he began lecturing at the Collège de France.

中文翻译：

---

皮埃尔·布迪厄的口头传统：分类斗争、国家论和马奈

本文讨论了法国社会学家皮埃尔·布迪厄 (Pierre Bourdieu) 最近的三篇遗文。继《论国家》（2014 年）和《马奈》（2017 年）之后，2019 年发布分类斗争，并涵盖了布迪厄 1981 年至 1982 年在法兰西学院担任社会学主席期间的第一次讲座，这种新兴的口头传统标志着一个合适的时刻根据社会学经典范围内前所未有的展示和知识转移模式，重新审视布迪厄的作品。综上所述，这些系列讲座，还有他的合作者的笔记、论文，甚至是一本未完成的书长手稿，构成了对布迪厄在其整个职业生涯中所处理的广泛主题的分析过程，构成了一个引人入胜的过程。因此，这些作品提供了重要的见解，应该有助于读者重新评估布迪厄更精美的作品。然而，除了可能引导国际社会学家更透彻地理解布迪厄最著名的理论的额外见解之外，人们发现，当按时间顺序审查时，布迪厄朝着成熟的国家理论的进展缓慢，这是他认为的一个话题。直到他开始在法兰西学院讲学时才开始正式分析。