Abstract After Sweden passed new health care legislation in 2010, Beardslee’s preventive family intervention (FI) was implemented to meet children’s rights to information and support. No studies have yet evaluated perceived effectiveness of FI in families with parental psychosis or its reception by families or professionals. This study focused on professionals’ experiences of offering FI to parents with psychosis, their partners, and their children. We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with FI-educated professionals at open care psychosis service units. Both authors applied thematic analysis to the interview data. The main reported benefit of FI was more open communication in the family; discussing the parent’s illness was thought to be helpful for all family members. Psychoeducation was described as particularly useful because family members generally seemed to lack sufficient information about psychosis. The FI manual also made professionals more confident about asking about patients’ parenting capacity and their children’s wellbeing. Despite positive descriptions, participants had conducted few FI interventions because of heavy workloads, organizational problems, and patients’ resistance to talking about their children. These barriers need to be addressed because children of parents with psychosis are a vulnerable group in great need of information and support.

中文翻译：

---

对专业人员对父母精神病患者进行Beardslee家庭干预的经验的定性评估

摘要瑞典于2010年通过了新的医疗保健立法之后，实施了Beardslee的预防性家庭干预措施（FI）来满足儿童的知情权和支持权。尚无研究评估父母亲精神病患者家庭中或家庭或专业人士接受FI的感知效果。这项研究侧重于专业人士为患有精神病的父母，他们的伴侣和他们的孩子提供FI的经验。我们在开放式护理精神病服务部门对接受过FI教育的专业人员进行了11次半结构化访谈。两位作者都对访谈数据进行了主题分析。据报道，FI的主要好处是家庭中的交流更加开放。讨论父母的病情被认为对所有家庭成员都有帮助。心理教育被描述为特别有用，因为家庭成员通常似乎缺乏有关精神病的足够信息。FI手册还使专业人员对询问患者的养育能力和孩子的健康状况更有信心。尽管有正面的描述，但由于工作量大，组织问题以及患者对孩子的谈论的抵制，参与者很少进行FI干预。这些障碍需要解决，因为患有精神病的父母的孩子是一个弱势群体，非常需要信息和支持。由于工作量大，组织问题以及患者不愿谈论自己的孩子，参与者很少进行FI干预。这些障碍需要解决，因为患有精神病的父母的孩子是一个弱势群体，非常需要信息和支持。由于工作量大，组织问题以及患者拒绝谈论孩子，参与者很少进行FI干预。这些障碍需要解决，因为患有精神病的父母的孩子是一个弱势群体，非常需要信息和支持。