We report a surprising experience with mobile technology: the lead author found herself seeing and acting differently while running over part of her usual running track with the exercise‐tracking application ‘Strava’ on her phone, even without focal attention to the app. We apply the method of problematization to a detailed empirical account of this experience, in conjunction with a literature analysis of taken‐for‐granted assumptions underpinning research on ‘mobile technology use’. This reveals that, while the relationship of attention, perception, movement and technology was a key element of the surprise, these themes are not well accounted for in current IS literature. In response, we employ William Gibson's ecological theory of visual perception to reinterpret the empirical account and thereby build a new understanding of the human plus mobile technology that we term moving‐with‐technology. We introduce to IS: moving‐with‐technology as a new analytical perspective; the new phenomena of digital sub‐species, digital‐niches and asynchronous co‐location; and stimulus for new ecologically oriented ‘mobile methods’. Moving‐with‐technology also has practical implications for urban planners who are using data from digital trace‐making tools such as Strava in their decision‐making, thereby generating what we call ecological feedback loops.

中文翻译：

---

超越“移动性”：对技术移动的新理解

我们报告了一个令人惊讶的移动技术体验：主要作者发现自己在使用手机上的运动跟踪应用程序“Strava”在她通常的跑道的一部分上跑步时，看到和采取不同的行动，即使没有关注该应用程序。我们将问题化方法应用于对这一经验的详细实证说明，并结合对支持“移动技术使用”研究的理所当然的假设的文献分析。这表明，虽然注意力、感知、运动和技术的关系是惊喜的关键因素，但这些主题在当前的 IS 文献中并没有得到很好的解释。作为回应，我们聘请了威廉吉布森 视觉感知的生态理论重新解释了经验解释，从而建立了对人类加移动技术的新理解，我们称之为移动技术。我们介绍了 IS：作为一种新的分析视角的技术移动；数字亚种、数字生态位和异步协同定位的新现象；和刺激以生态为导向的新“移动方法”。与技术一起移动对于城市规划者也具有实际意义，他们在决策中使用来自 Strava 等数字追踪工具的数据，从而产生我们所说的生态反馈循环。和刺激以生态为导向的新“移动方法”。与技术一起移动对于城市规划者也具有实际意义，他们在决策中使用来自 Strava 等数字追踪工具的数据，从而产生我们所说的生态反馈循环。和刺激以生态为导向的新“移动方法”。与技术一起移动对于城市规划者也具有实际意义，他们在决策中使用来自 Strava 等数字追踪工具的数据，从而产生我们所说的生态反馈循环。