This article gives a new perspective on the themes of violence, memory, and criminal justice at the end of the Wars of Religion by focusing on a particularly well-documented criminal case tried by the Parlement of Paris. Previous studies of the end of the troubles have often focused on the politics and personality of Henri IV or studied memory culture through elite cultural production. This article instead examines how the witnesses who confronted the royalist military capitain Mathurin de La Cange made use of a broad, social memory of the civil wars and shows how their use of the courts formed part of a larger pattern of post-war conflict resolution. This was a time when people in France endured decades of warfare and confessional division, but nevertheless emerged determined to put an end to the violence by committing to resolve their disputes through the law.

中文翻译：

---

裁决麻烦：宗教战争结束时的暴力、记忆和刑事司法

本文通过关注巴黎议会审理的一个特别有据可查的刑事案件，为宗教战争结束时的暴力、记忆和刑事司法等主题提供了新的视角。以往对末日困境的研究，往往集中在亨利四世的政治和个性上，或者通过精英文化生产研究记忆文化。相反，本文研究了与保皇派军事首领马图林·德拉坎热对峙的证人如何利用内战的广泛社会记忆，并展示他们对法院的使用如何构成了战后冲突解决更大模式的一部分。这是法国人民忍受数十年战争和宗教分裂的时期，