This article explains why and how it is possible to give greater democratic meaning to an evaluative process by bringing into dialogue the Gender + perspective and a critical approach to deliberative theory within its design. Furthermore, it identifies the methodological challenges of using this intersectional approach to create more inclusive evaluative procedures. Taking into account the experience of the evaluation of Law 4/2005 for Equality between Women and Men in the Basque Country (Spain, 2015–2016), the text explains that the enclave deliberation praxis proposed by critical deliberative theory helps to resolve the challenges that emerge from the implementation of the Gender + perspective in the evaluation of public policies. These challenges include the incorporation of the empowerment perspective into the evaluation, and guaranteeing dialogue between expert knowledge on gender and other more ‘intuitive’ types of knowledge.

中文翻译：

---

批判性商议理论如何帮助解决从性别+角度评估的方法论挑战的评估问题？

本文解释了为什么以及如何通过在其设计中引入性别 + 视角和协商理论的批判方法来赋予评估过程更大的民主意义。此外，它还确定了使用这种交叉方法来创建更具包容性的评估程序的方法学挑战。考虑到评估巴斯克地区男女平等的第 4/2005 号法律（西班牙，2015-2016 年）的经验，文本解释说，批判性审议理论提出的飞地审议实践有助于解决以下挑战：在公共政策评估中从性别+视角的实施中脱颖而出。这些挑战包括将赋权观点纳入评估、