Land ownership determines fundamental interests, prescribing a framework of alliances and oppositions around its development and use. The public sector constitutes one of the main categories of large landowners, although this type of ownership takes more than one form, due to the wide variety of public sector bodies holding property. Public land management became one of the focuses of austerity policies in many European countries after the burst of economic crisis in 2008–2009, externally imposed in those countries that went through bailout programmes. In Greece, the history of land policy shows that a fundamental objective of state policy was the distribution and liquidation of public land, a policy that contributed to the formation of an extensive system of small land ownership. From 2010 onwards, a plethora of formal legislation sought to accelerate development procedures for the remaining large-scale public property, as a background resource to attract large-scale, so-called “strategic”, investments. This paper explores the critical characteristics and outcomes of the reforms to transform public land policy, identifying the interactions with urban planning, before and during the economic crisis. Taking a longer temporal view, the paper highlights the entrenched relationships existing between public land policy, urban planning and property development processes and their significance in the diachronic continuities often concealed in major policy reversals and reforms. It argues that ultimately there is a lack of a coherent and sustainable public property valorisation policy, being deprived of any institutional innovation for new forms of urban development, as well as of social acceptance.

中文翻译：

---

希腊的公共土地政策和城市规划：危机背景下的历时连续性和突然逆转

土地所有权决定基本利益，围绕土地的开发和使用规定了联盟和反对的框架。公共部门是大土地所有者的主要类别之一，尽管由于持有财产的公共部门机构种类繁多，这种所有权的形式不止一种。在 2008-2009 年经济危机爆发后，公共土地管理成为许多欧洲国家紧缩政策的重点之一，这是在那些经历过救助计划的国家外部强加的。在希腊，土地政策的历史表明，国家政策的一个基本目标是公共土地的分配和清算，这一政策有助于形成广泛的小土地所有权制度。从 2010 年开始，大量正式立法试图加快剩余大型公共财产的开发程序，作为吸引大规模、所谓的“战略”投资的背景资源。本文探讨了改革公共土地政策的关键特征和结果，确定经济危机之前和期间与城市规划的相互作用。从更长远的角度来看，本文强调了公共土地政策、城市规划和房地产开发过程之间存在的根深蒂固的关系，以及它们在历时连续性中的重要性，这些连续性往往隐藏在重大政策逆转和改革中。它认为最终缺乏连贯和可持续的公共财产增值政策，