Drawing on select works of Adorno, we will first rehearse his reasons for a rejuvenation of philosophy and apply them to philosophers working on world philosophical traditions. We will then analyse Adorno’s arguments pertaining to the theory–praxis relation to ascertain whether his thought could accommodate a study of world philosophical traditions for the simple reason that they are present in a particular society. Shifting our focus slightly, we reflect upon how current ways of professional philosophizing affect the study of world philosophical traditions. As the example of Māori philosophy demonstrates, current philosophical practices seem to delimit the search for the unconventional in academic philosophy. Through its philosophical appropriation, the so-called unconventional tends to mimic conventional patterns in academic philosophy. We will then attempt to find reasons to critique this process within the Adornoian framework itself. The conclusion draws together different strands of the discussion and delineates some paths to take forward the world philosophies project in an Adornoian spirit.

中文翻译：

---

拒绝“愚蠢的辞职智慧”：KaupapaMāori与Adorno交谈

我们将借鉴阿多诺的精选作品，首先演练他使哲学复兴的原因，并将其应用于研究世界哲学传统的哲学家。然后，我们将分析阿多诺关于理论与实践关系的论点，以确定其思想是否可以容纳对世界哲学传统的研究，原因很简单，因为它们存在于特定的社会中。稍微转移我们的注意力，我们就会反思当前的专业哲学方法如何影响世界哲学传统的研究。正如毛利人哲学的例子所表明的那样，当前的哲学实践似乎限制了对学术哲学中非常规性的探索。通过其哲学上的占有，所谓的非常规趋向于模仿学术哲学中的常规模式。然后，我们将尝试在Adornoian框架本身中找到批评这一过程的理由。结论总结了不同的讨论思路，并描绘了以阿多诺精神推动世界哲学计划的一些途径。