This article explores self-censorship among journalists by drawing on Bourdieusian field theory and New Censorship Theory. The article analyses the experiences of local Crimean journalists in the period following Russia’s annexation of the peninsula, and during the rapid increase of Russian state control over local media. The analysis presented here draws on 70 biographical interviews conducted with local journalists who worked in Crimea for a period of at least 1 year between 2013 and 2017. In the first part of the article, I propose a Bourdieusian approach to self-censorship. In the second part of the article, I focus on illustrative examples of journalists who have risen to prominent positions in new post-2014 Crimean media, and detail three self-censorship practices: (1) governing ‘the other’ (a journalist engages in self-censorship only when it comes to ‘the ethnic other’: they refuse to practice self-censorship when working for Moscow-based Russian language media, but agree to self-censorship in local media targeting Crimean Tatars); (2) alerting the authorities (a journalist strikes deals with local politicians by not reporting on local infrastructural problems, instead directly asking the local government to fix them in return for favourable media coverage); and (3) self-censorship as patience (a journalist oversees positive reporting of local news and avoids negative topics as they wait patiently for Crimea’s growing pains to pass).

中文翻译：

---

走向布迪厄式的自我审查社会学：我们可以从适应 2014 年后克里米亚快速政治变革的记者身上学到什么

本文借鉴布迪厄的场论和新审查理论，探讨了记者的自我审查。文章分析了克里米亚当地记者在俄罗斯吞并半岛后以及俄罗斯国家对当地媒体控制迅速加强期间的经历。此处的分析借鉴了对 2013 年至 2017 年在克里米亚工作至少一年的当地记者进行的 70 次传记采访。在文章的第一部分，我提出了一种布迪厄式的自我审查方法。在文章的第二部分，我重点介绍了在 2014 年后克里米亚新媒体中担任重要职位的记者的说明性例子，并详细介绍了三种自我审查做法：(1) 管理“他者”（记者只在涉及“种族他者”时才进行自我审查：他们在为莫斯科俄语媒体工作时拒绝进行自我审查，但同意自我审查当地媒体针对克里米亚鞑靼人）；(2) 提醒当局（记者与当地政客打交道，不报道当地的基础设施问题，而是直接要求当地政府解决问题，以换取媒体的积极报道）；(3) 作为耐心的自我审查（一名记者监督当地新闻的正面报道并避免负面话题，因为他们耐心地等待克里米亚的成长阵痛过去）。但同意在当地媒体针对克里米亚鞑靼人进行自我审查）；(2) 提醒当局（记者与当地政客打交道，不报道当地的基础设施问题，而是直接要求当地政府解决问题，以换取媒体的积极报道）；(3) 作为耐心的自我审查（一名记者监督当地新闻的正面报道并避免负面话题，因为他们耐心地等待克里米亚的成长阵痛过去）。但同意在当地媒体针对克里米亚鞑靼人进行自我审查）；(2) 提醒当局（记者与当地政客打交道，不报道当地的基础设施问题，而是直接要求当地政府解决问题，以换取媒体的积极报道）；(3) 作为耐心的自我审查（一名记者监督当地新闻的正面报道并避免负面话题，因为他们耐心地等待克里米亚的成长阵痛过去）。