当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ethnography › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data
Ethnography ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-17 , DOI: 10.1177/1466138119859386
Lisa Russell 1 , Ruth Barley 2
Affiliation  

Establishing trust and obtaining informed consent with participants is reliant upon on a process whereby unequally positioned agents constantly re-negotiate (mis)trust and consent during ethnographic encounters. All research has been increasingly subject to an intensification in ethical regulation, within a context whereby Eurocentric norms and ethical guidelines arguably diminish individual accountability under the guise of quasi-contractual relationships. This phenomenon has particular implications for ethnography and its management of ethics, given its intimate, longitudinal and receptive nature. Two expert ethnographers working with children and young people draw upon their work to reveal how issues of informed consent and data ownership can shift and be a source of tension and unequal power dynamics. The ethnographer requires autonomy while managing ethics soundly in situ to work within the messiness and unpredictability of participants’ everyday lives.

中文翻译:

人种学,伦理学和数据所有权

建立信任并获得参与者的知情同意依赖于一个过程,即不平等定位的特工在人种学过程中不断重新协商(不当)信任和同意。在以准欧洲关系为幌子的情况下,以欧洲为中心的规范和道德准则可以减少个人问责制的背景下,所有研究都越来越受到道德规范的强化。鉴于这种现象具有亲密,纵向和接受的性质,因此它对人种学及其伦理学管理具有特别的意义。两位与儿童和年轻人一起工作的民族志专家根据他们的工作来揭示知情同意和数据所有权问题如何发生变化,并成为紧张局势和不平等权力动态的根源。
更新日期:2019-07-17
down
wechat
bug