当前位置: X-MOL 学术Critical Social Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘We know it works. . .’: The Troubled Families Programme and the pre-determined boundary judgements of decontextualised policy evaluation
Critical Social Policy ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-18 , DOI: 10.1177/0261018319892443
Daniel Silver 1 , Stephen Crossley 2
Affiliation  

This article draws on the Troubled Families Programme (TFP) to highlight the ways in which particular contexts – such as socioeconomic and symbolic structures – are neglected in forms of evaluation with an establishment orientation. The article problematises two key aspects of decontextualised evaluation: firstly, the privileging of pre-determined relations of cause and effect; and secondly, the unproblematized framing of policy problems. More contextualised forms of evaluation are presented as a way to open up boundaries of investigation. Lastly, it is argued that an anti-naturalist foundation for evaluation can broaden the scope of learning beyond the original framing of a policy.

中文翻译:

'我们知道它有效。. .':问题家庭计划和去语境化政策评估的预先确定的边界判断

本文利用问题家庭计划 (TFP) 来强调特定背景(例如社会经济和象征结构)在具有机构导向的评估形式中被忽视的方式。这篇文章对去上下文化评估的两个关键方面提出了问题:第一,预先确定的因果关系的特权;其次,政策问题的框架没有问题。提出了更多情境化的评估形式,作为打开调查边界的一种方式。最后,有人认为,反自然主义的评估基础可以扩大学习范围,超出政策的原始框架。
更新日期:2019-12-18
down
wechat
bug