ABSTRACT Gardens in Australia are considered an important site of heritage maintenance and negotiation for their capacity to materialise transformations in everyday life, design, lifestyles, demographics, environment, as well as social and cultural practices. In the case of conservation areas, gardens tend to be valued in terms of their closeness and potential to preserve specific historical elements. Plants in these gardens are cultivated to evoke period designs, such as Federation (c.1890–1915) and cottage gardens. In this article we turn to gardens and gardening to make sense of entanglements between cultural, historical and environmental elements, and we ask: what role do plants play in shaping our understanding of suburban heritage? To answer this question, we draw on oral histories, archival research and ethnography in Haberfield, the first model garden suburb in Australia. We show how plants channel and mediate multiple concerns that contest and extend ideas of heritage circulating in public discourse. Foregrounding the centrality of plants, this article contributes a dynamic definition of heritage that includes the entanglement of environmental stewardship and individual and collective heritage.

中文翻译：

---

重新映射遗产和花园郊区：哈伯菲尔德的公民生态

摘要 澳大利亚的花园被认为是遗产维护和谈判的重要场所，因为它们能够实现日常生活、设计、生活方式、人口统计、环境以及社会和文化实践的转变。在保护区的情况下，花园的价值往往取决于它们的亲近性和保护特定历史元素的潜力。这些花园中的植物被种植以唤起时代设计，例如联邦（约 1890-1915 年）和小屋花园。在这篇文章中，我们转向花园和园艺来理解文化、历史和环境元素之间的纠葛，我们会问：植物在塑造我们对郊区遗产的理解方面扮演什么角色？为了回答这个问题，我们借鉴了哈伯菲尔德的口述历史、档案研究和民族志，澳大利亚第一个模范花园郊区。我们展示了植物如何引导和调解在公共话语中竞争和扩展遗产观念的多重关注。本文突出植物的中心地位，对遗产的动态定义做出了贡献，其中包括环境管理与个人和集体遗产的纠缠。