ABSTRACT Contemporary feminist philosophy classically tends to reject ideas of historical and biological progress as patriarchal and/or capitalist constructs of temporality. Lately, however, the new materialism in feminism attempts to ‘recover’ the writings of Charles Darwin and evolutionary science, constructing a non-teleological and anti-essentialist feminist theory of mutability, transversality and trans-species connection. Referring to the work of Elizabeth Grosz, Rick Dolphijn, Iris van der Tuin and Jane Bennett, this article critically analyses the new materialists’ reading of some key elements in evolutionary theory and the ‘newness’ of new materialism itself, in an attempt to explore the broader philosophical bases for their claims, and the theory of ‘life’ that appears as a consequence.

中文翻译：

---

女权时代的“转折”：“新唯物主义”女权主义哲学中的进化逻辑、生命和更新

摘要 当代女权主义哲学经典地倾向于拒绝历史和生物进步的思想，将其视为父权制和/或资本主义的时间结构。然而，最近女权主义中的新唯物主义试图“恢复”查尔斯达尔文和进化科学的著作，构建一个非目的论和反本质主义的可变性、横向和跨物种联系的女权主义理论。本文参考伊丽莎白·格罗兹、里克·多尔菲因、艾里斯·范德图因和简·贝内特的著作，批判性地分析了新唯物主义者对进化论中一些关键要素的解读以及新唯物主义本身的“新奇”，试图探索他们主张的更广泛的哲学基础，以及作为结果出现的“生命”理论。