ABSTRACT Ways of Baloma is a deliberate attempt to move Anthropology as a discipline by means of a new account of a classic locale for the practice. How does it manage this purpose? This essay evaluates Mosko’s attempt from the perspective of another ethnographer with long-term ethnographic research in the Kula Ring. Paradoxes abound in the book and are featured in this review. For while Malinowski’s theoretical pronouncements quickly lost their significance for most anthropologists, his Trobriand ethnography became a model in its own right. And it is this model Mosko attempts to hold up for review and revision based on his view of the contemporary theoretical state of the art. This review outlines some of the strategies and ideas, as well as the regional locale, Mosko deploys in an attempt to make a new Trobriand ethnography a model for anthropological analysis.

中文翻译：

---

马林诺夫斯基重演

Baloma 的抽象方式是有意尝试通过对实践的经典场所的新描述将人类学作为一门学科。它如何管理这个目的？本文从另一位长期在库拉环进行民族志研究的民族志学者的角度来评价莫斯科的尝试。书中的悖论比比皆是，并在这篇评论中有所体现。虽然马林诺夫斯基的理论声明很快就对大多数人类学家失去了意义，但他的特罗布里恩民族志本身就成为了一个典范。正是这种模式，莫斯科试图根据他对当代理论艺术状态的看法进行审查和修订。这篇评论概述了一些策略和想法，以及区域设置，