Abstract

As major sociocultural phenomena, sport and its Olympic showcase are unable to escape either the heightened subjective (re)interpretation of the past or the social frameworks structuring the extension of memory representations during the final decades of the twentieth century. In order to better understand the phenomenon, this article aims to determine the role and weight of the various actors and institutions of the Olympic Movement in safeguarding the ideology advocated by Pierre de Coubertin. From the 1950s on and at several different levels – individual and collective – the promotion of a legacy oriented towards the pedagogical principles of Olympism became a recurrent challenge in institutional Olympic space. Through the segmentation and diversity of its uses, however, this memory raises the issue of its own instrumentalization and contributes to highlighting discordant heritage schemas within a movement presented as being unitary.

抽象的

作为主要的社会文化现象，运动及其在奥林匹克运动中的展示不能逃脱对过去的主观（重新）解释的增强，也无法逃脱在二十世纪最后几十年中构成记忆表现形式扩展的社会框架。为了更好地理解这种现象，本文旨在确定奥林匹克运动的各个参与者和机构在维护皮埃尔·德·顾拜旦所倡导的意识形态中的作用和分量。从1950年代开始，在个人和集体的几个不同层次上，弘扬面向奥林匹克主义教学原则的遗产成为制度性奥林匹克空间中经常出现的挑战。但是，通过其用途的细分和多样性，