ABSTRACT The International Criminal Court has been recently called upon by the Court’s Prosecutor to decide a highly unusual application, to approve its jurisdiction over the State of Israel which has not acceded to its Statute. The Prosecutor asks the Court to apply to Israel a special legal standard, openly discriminating it in comparison with other states. The Prosecutor’s submission consciously deviates from established theories on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in favour of unfounded contentions which were discussed and rejected by mainstream scholarship, supporting her tautological arguments with references to vague, unauthoritative sources. This article demonstrates that the accumulative weight of all these factors points to the conclusion that the Prosecutor’s submission constitutes in fact a sophisticated action in the service of Palestinian Lawfare against Israel rather than a bona fide legal motion. The consequences of this project, should it be endorsed by the Court, might prove devastative to international law and the present world order.

中文翻译：

---

国际刑事法院检察官为巴勒斯坦法律服务

摘要 最近，国际刑事法院的检察官要求国际刑事法院对一项极不寻常的申请作出裁决，批准其对尚未加入其规约的以色列国的管辖权。检察官要求法院对以色列适用特殊的法律标准，与其他国家相比，公开歧视以色列。检察官的陈述有意识地偏离了关于以巴冲突的既定理论，支持主流学术界讨论和拒绝的毫无根据的论点，支持她的同义反复式的论点，并引用了含糊的、非权威的来源。这篇文章表明，所有这些因素的累积权重表明，检察官的陈述实际上构成了一项为巴勒斯坦针对以色列的法律服务的复杂行动，而不是一项真正的法律动议。如果该项目得到法院的认可，其后果可能会破坏国际法和当前的世界秩序。