Abstract The prediction of sexual violence recidivism is an important societal concern and has been the frequent subject of psychological research. Although research has supported the use of the MMPI-2-RF in violence risk assessment, there is a paucity of research related to sexual violence risk assessment. The present study evaluated the convergent validity of the MMPI-2-RF with measures used in sexual violence risk assessment evaluations (i.e., the Static 99, SVR-20, and PCL:SV) in a sample of German inmates in a psychological treatment setting. Analyses generally showed an expected pattern of results, with MMPI-2-RF externalizing scales having the strongest associations with measures of violence and sexual violence risk assessment. Indeed, although smaller associations were found with Static-99 scales, there were moderate to large associations between SVR-20 and PCL:SV scores and MMPI-2-RF externalizing scales. Taken together, these findings suggest that, although the MMPI-2-RF does not appear to be associated with specific static risk factors (e.g., previous victim qualities, type of sexual offenses), the externalizing scales on the MMPI-2-RF are useful in examining more dynamic factors (e.g., those assessed on the SVR-20) in conjunction with other dynamic and static risk tools (e.g., SVR-20, Static-99) in sexual violence risk evaluations.

中文翻译：

---

MMPI-2-RF在性暴力风险评估中的效用

摘要对性暴力再犯的预测是一个重要的社会关注问题，并且一直是心理学研究的热点。尽管研究支持在暴力风险评估中使用MMPI-2-RF，但与性暴力风险评估相关的研究很少。本研究使用心理治疗环境中的德国囚犯样本，通过性暴力风险评估评估（即静态99，SVR-20和PCL：SV）中使用的措施，评估了MMPI-2-RF的收敛效度。 。分析通常显示出预期的结果模式，而MMPI-2-RF外部化量表与暴力和性暴力风险评估方法之间的关联最强。确实，尽管发现与Static-99量表的关联较小，SVR-20和PCL：SV得分与MMPI-2-RF外在化量表之间存在中等到较大的关联。综上，这些发现表明，尽管MMPI-2-RF似乎与特定的静态风险因素（例如，先前的受害者素质，性犯罪类型）无关，但MMPI-2-RF的外在量表是在评估性暴力风险评估中的其他动态和静态风险工具（例如SVR-20，Static-99）时，可用于检查更多动态因素（例如，在SVR-20上评估的因素）。