ABSTRACT

According to Stephens, Kemeny’s integrated rental markets have all disappeared on the level of nation-states. In his reply, the author draws attention to sub-national housing markets where cost rental principles continue to dominate within a city or region. Where local majorities and coalitions allow, the legal and institutional preconditions for integrated rental markets can be safeguarded and renewed. This includes various forms of land policy and rent control, and a large and experienced sector of cost-rental housing providers - public, non-profit and benevolent landlords alike. Urban/regional support for such housing policies seems to be on the rise, as a reaction to the massive increase in housing costs and affordability issues brought about by the ongoing financialization of housing.

摘要

据史蒂芬斯（Stephens）说，在某些民族国家的层面上，科梅尼的综合租赁市场已全部消失。在其答复中，作者提请人们注意在城市或地区内成本租赁原则继续占主导地位的地方住房市场。在当地多数和联盟允许的情况下，可以维护和更新整合租赁市场的法律和体制前提。这包括各种形式的土地政策和租金控制，以及庞大且经验丰富的成本租赁住房提供者部门，包括公共，非营利性和善意的房东。城市/区域对此类住房政策的支持似乎正在增加，这是对住房持续金融化带来的住房成本和可负担性问题大量增加的反应。