ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to identify the communication dialectics regarding the conflicts that occur between the government and environmental activists in the Indonesian Conservation Area. The activists refused the government's policy on changing the function of Kamojang nature reserve that has reserved it into a nature tourism park. The tradition of the transactional communication emphasizes the similarity of meaning, viewpoints, and reference frames to build the same foundation among the environmental actors regarding the importance of managing conservation areas and the significance of creating effective environmental communication. The findings show that differences in the points of view and the frames of reference find in preserving the nature reserve area lead to conflicts and communication barriers. Furthermore, the conflict of the environmental policy can reduced with the negotiation, the approaches of non-litigation, the dialog, and intensive communication, also, an open and interactive decision making. The determination of environmental policies needed to involve stakeholders and non-governmental actors in a formal and consultative collective process. The prosperous collaboration will be able to encourage synergistic and multi-directional communication.

抽象的

这项研究的目的是确定有关印尼保护区政府与环境活动家之间发生的冲突的沟通辩证法。激进分子拒绝政府改变已将其保留为自然旅游公园的卡莫让自然保护区功能的政策。交易交流的传统强调含义，观点和参考框架的相似性，以便在环境参与者之间建立相同的基础，包括管理保护区的重要性和建立有效的环境交流的重要性。调查结果表明，在保护自然保护区方面的观点和参考框架的差异导致冲突和沟通障碍。此外，通过谈判，非诉讼，对话和密集交流的方法，以及开放，互动的决策，可以减少环境政策的冲突。确定环境政策需要使利益攸关方和非政府行为者参与正式和协商的集体程序。繁荣的合作将能够鼓励协同和多方向的交流。