ABSTRACT This paper discusses the topic of artistic ‘isms’ in the history and historiography of modern Dutch and Flemish art in a broader European context – such as Constructivism, Neoplasticism, Elementarism, Futurism, Cubism, Expressionism etc. Exemplified by the case of the historical artistic and literary avant-garde from the Low Countries, with its polyphony of overlapping artistic ‘isms’, this paper aims to scrutinize various limitations and imprecisions that result from the use of ‘isms’ in the history and historiography of modern art, exemplified by selected avant-garde formations such as De Stijl, Het Overzicht or 7 Art.

中文翻译：

---

现代艺术的“障碍”：比利时，荷兰及其他地区

摘要本文讨论了在更广阔的欧洲语境下现代荷兰和佛兰德艺术的历史和史学中的艺术“主义”主题，例如建构主义，新塑主义，基本主义，未来主义，立体主义，表现主义等。以历史为例低地国家的艺术和文学前卫艺术具有多重重叠的艺术“主义”，旨在探讨现代艺术史和史学中因使用“主义”而产生的各种局限性和不精确性，例如选定的前卫队形，例如De Stijl，Het Overzicht或7 Art。