Community processes to address fractured social relationships and well‐being remain the least examined dimensions in studies of legacies of civil wars. This article addresses these limitations by analyzing how the wartime and postwar generations have negotiated the legacies of the civil war (1976–1992) in a farming economy region in Mozambique. Based on a 14‐year (2002–2015) study of community courts in Mozambique, we analyzed the types of social conflicts and the associations with gender, age, risk factors, self‐described health impairments, and the timing of farming activities. We identified n = 3,456 participants and found that perennial sources of disputes were related to family formation and maintenance, defamation, accusations of perpetration of serious civil wartime violations, mistrust, debts, and domestic violence. Furthermore, conflict relations were associated with gender, age, risk factors, and health problems. This study concludes that civil wars have lasting multifaceted legacies, but generational tensions, availability of community institutions, and economic resources shape social relationships and well‐being outcomes while averting revenge cycles among civilian war survivors.

中文翻译：

---

内战的遗产：对农业经济社会冲突和福祉结果的 14 年研究

在内战遗产研究中，解决破裂的社会关系和福祉的社区进程仍然是研究最少的维度。本文通过分析战时和战后几代人如何在莫桑比克的农业经济地区谈判内战（1976-1992）的遗产来解决这些局限性。基于对莫桑比克社区法院为期 14 年（2002 年至 2015 年）的研究，我们分析了社会冲突的类型以及与性别、年龄、风险因素、自我描述的健康障碍和农业活动时间的关系。我们确定了3,456名 参与者，发现长期存在的纠纷根源与家庭组建和维持、诽谤、内战期间严重违法行为的指控、不信任、债务和家庭暴力有关。此外，冲突关系与性别、年龄、危险因素和健康问题有关。这项研究的结论是，内战具有持久的多方面遗产，但代际紧张、社区机构的可用性和经济资源塑造了社会关系和福祉结果，同时避免了内战幸存者的报复循环。