The article examines cross‐discourse of the EuropeanMobilityWeek (EMW) campaign launched at the European level and analyses how it is adapted in six European cities. The objective is to unveil a governance framing that unmasks how cities shape their climate leadership discourse according to their governance aspirations and capacity. By looking at the adaptations across cities' discourses, this research acknowledges the need to confront the limitations and challenges that cities encounter to effectively contribute to global climate governance. It suggests that a governance framing exposes these challenges by showing the different realities of cities when they highlight particular governance modes in their discourse. The methodology combines critical discourse analysis and corpus techniques to analyse a total of 18 campaigns in different temporal, geographical and political contexts. EMW's discourse issued at European level is used as the reference corpus to examine how cities reframe their discourse by weakening or strengthening two governance modes characterised as an action‐taking approach that focuses on the steering role of government, and a decision‐making approach that highlights the city's interdependencies in a societal context. Learning more about discourse as a vindicator of governance modes in urban climate governance can contribute to a better understanding of how climate transitions are actually put into practise. The research suggests that climate leadership attributed to cities is in fact a complex and dynamic reality that has to be cautiously examined in order to understand the challenges of climate transitions.

中文翻译：

---

城市与气候变化的治理框架

本文研究了在欧洲范围内发起的“欧洲移动周刊”（EMW）运动的跨话题性，并分析了其如何在六个欧洲城市中得到应用。目的是揭露治理框架这揭示了城市如何根据其治理愿望和能力来塑造其气候领导力话语。通过研究各种城市话语的适应性变化，这项研究认识到有必要应对城市遇到的局限性和挑战，以有效地为全球气候治理做出贡献。它表明，治理框架通过在城市强调其话语中的特定治理模式时展示城市的不同现实，从而暴露了这些挑战。该方法结合了批判性话语分析和语料库技术，可以在不同的时间，地理和政治背景下分析总共18项运动。EMW' 在欧洲一级发布的话语被用作参考语料库，以研究城市如何通过削弱或加强两种治理模式来重构其话语结构，这两种治理模式的特征在于采取行动的方法侧重于政府的指导作用，而决策方法则强调在社会背景下城市的相互依存关系。学习更多有关话语作为城市气候治理中治理模式的辩护者，可以有助于更好地了解气候转换实际上是如何进行的。该研究表明，归因于城市的气候领导作用实际上是一个复杂而动态的现实，必须仔细研究以了解气候变化的挑战。以及在社会背景下强调城市相互依存关系的决策方法。学习更多有关话语作为城市气候治理中治理模式的辩护者，可以有助于更好地了解气候转换实际上是如何进行的。该研究表明，归因于城市的气候领导力实际上是一个复杂而动态的现实，必须仔细研究以了解气候变化的挑战。以及在社会背景下强调城市相互依存关系的决策方法。学习更多有关话语作为城市气候治理中治理模式的辩护者，可以有助于更好地了解气候转换实际上是如何进行的。该研究表明，归因于城市的气候领导作用实际上是一个复杂而动态的现实，必须仔细研究以了解气候变化的挑战。