There is a growing interest in localized land registration, in which user rights are acknowledged and recorded through a community-based procedure, as an alternative to centralized titling to promote secure tenure in sub-Saharan Africa. Localized land registration is expected to reduce land disputes, yet it remains unclear how it impacts disputes in practice. This is an urgent question for war-affected settings that experience sensitive land disputes. This article discusses findings from ethnographic fieldwork in Burundi on pilot projects for land certification. It identifies three ways in which certification feeds into land conflicts rather than preventing or resolving them. First, land certification represents a chance for local people to enter a new round of claim making, as those ignored or disenfranchised in earlier rounds see new opportunities. Second, it offers an avenue for institutional competition between different land-governing institutions. Third, certification provides politicians with openings to interfere in tenure relations and to expand their support base. The authors conclude that these problems are not simply a matter of inadequate policy design. Rather, there are crucial political dimensions to land conflicts and land tenure in Burundi, which means that land registration programmes run the risk of inflaming conflictive property relations in rural communities.

中文翻译：

---

化解土地纠纷？布隆迪土地认证和争议解决的政治

人们对本地化土地登记越来越感兴趣，其中通过基于社区的程序承认和记录用户权利，作为集中所有权的替代方案，以促进撒哈拉以南非洲的土地使用权。本地化土地登记有望减少土地纠纷，但在实践中如何影响纠纷尚不清楚。对于经历敏感土地纠纷的受战争影响的环境来说，这是一个紧迫的问题。本文讨论了布隆迪关于土地认证试点项目的民族志实地考察的结果。它确定了认证导致土地冲突而不是预防或解决冲突的三种方式。首先，土地认证代表了当地人进入新一轮索赔的机会，因为那些在前几轮被忽视或被剥夺权利的人看到了新的机会。其次，它为不同土地管理机构之间的制度竞争提供了途径。第三，认证为政客提供了干预权属关系和扩大支持基础的机会。作者得出结论，这些问题不仅仅是政策设计不当的问题。相反，布隆迪的土地冲突和土地保有权具有重要的政治层面，这意味着土地登记计划有可能激化农村社区的冲突财产关系。作者得出结论，这些问题不仅仅是政策设计不当的问题。相反，布隆迪的土地冲突和土地保有权具有重要的政治层面，这意味着土地登记计划有可能激化农村社区的冲突财产关系。作者得出结论，这些问题不仅仅是政策设计不当的问题。相反，布隆迪的土地冲突和土地保有权具有重要的政治层面，这意味着土地登记计划有可能激化农村社区的冲突财产关系。