当前位置: X-MOL 学术Area › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Tangible co‐production? Engaging and creating with fathers
Area ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1111/area.12691
Iryna Culpin 1 , Esther Dermott 2 , Jonathan Ives 3 , Julie MacLeavy 4
Affiliation  

This paper adds to an increasing body of social science literature, which engages with the research practice of “co‐production.” It aims to make a distinctive contribution by suggesting that what is produced under this process should be given greater attention. Previous literature has focused on the “co” (cooperative) element: debating whether and under what conditions wider participation between academic and non‐academic actors can be genuinely emancipatory, and the degree to which more radical research approaches centred on empowering marginalised groups have been usurped through management discourses of participatory governance. Drawing on a case study of a pilot project that developed support resources for new fathers under the auspices of a co‐production research design, the paper highlights the dynamics and limitations of the process, but additionally and distinctively suggests an important way in which the success of co‐production can be judged that includes practical and tangible outputs beyond academic knowledge and takes objects and materiality seriously as a dimension of co‐production in an academic setting.

中文翻译:


有形的联合制作?与父亲一起参与和创造



这篇论文丰富了越来越多的社会科学文献,这些文献涉及“共同生产”的研究实践。它旨在通过建议应更多地关注这一过程中产生的内容来做出独特的贡献。先前的文献集中于“co”(合作)要素:争论学术和非学术行为者之间的更广泛参与是否以及在什么条件下可以真正实现解放,以及以赋予边缘群体权力为中心的更激进的研究方法在多大程度上得到了解放。通过参与式治理的管理话语来篡夺。本文借鉴了一个试点项目的案例研究,该项目在联合生产研究设计的支持下为新父亲开发了支持资源,本文强调了该过程的动态和局限性,但另外又独特地提出了成功的一个重要方式。合作生产可以被认为包括超越学术知识的实际和有形产出,并认真对待对象和物质性作为学术环境中合作生产的一个维度。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug