Using a theoretical framework conceptualising mobility regimes, solidarity, as well as scales and “sanctuary/solidarity cities”, this article examines notions of locally scaled solidarity by looking at Hamburg and Athens. We undertake comparisons on three dimensions. First, between the historical and institutional context of migration in Germany and Greece. Second, between urban movements in Hamburg and Athens. Finally, between the balance sheet of Seebrücke Hamburg and the Solidarity Cities Initiative of Athens. We contend that different migrant mobilities, as well as the solidarity movements they bring forth, structure different geographies of solidarity. We argue that movements in Hamburg were relatively more successful in renegotiating restrictive migration regimes on the local scale than their counterparts in Athens. We view these differences as prefigured by different types of migrant mobility—arrival in Hamburg, transit in Athens—in the context of a European bordering geography characterised by asymmetrical power relations.

中文翻译：

---

“我们在这里留下来”与“欧洲最好的酒店”：汉堡和雅典作为团结的地理

使用将流动性制度、团结以及规模和“避难所/团结城市”概念化的理论框架，本文通过观察汉堡和雅典来研究当地规模团结的概念。我们从三个维度进行比较。首先，在德国和希腊移民的历史和制度背景之间。其次，在汉堡和雅典的城市运动之间。最后，在 Seebrücke Hamburg 的资产负债表和雅典的团结城市倡议之间。我们认为，不同的移民流动，以及他们带来的团结运动，构成了不同的团结地域。我们认为，与雅典的同行相比，汉堡的运动在重新谈判当地规模的限制性移民制度方面相对更成功。