当前位置: X-MOL 学术Antipode › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Ambiguities of Homelessness Governance: Disentangling Care and Revanchism in the Neoliberalising City
Antipode ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-18 , DOI: 10.1111/anti.12671
Andrew Clarke 1 , Cameron Parsell 1
Affiliation  

Whilst “caring” responses to homelessness (e.g. shelters, drop-in centres) have been held up by some as a counter-current to the revanchist city, recent US studies highlight how the structural dynamics of neoliberalisation can implicate caring spaces in revanchist processes of discipline and spatial control. In this paper, we employ an assemblage approach to examine the intersections between care, revanchism and neoliberalisation in Brisbane, Australia. We extend the insights of recent studies by showing how the vulnerability of care to the revanchist pressures of neoliberalisation play out outside the US, despite the prominence of care rationalities and a milder revanchist politics. However, we also push beyond this insight to demonstrate the ongoing progressive potential of care in the neoliberalising city, despite its vulnerabilities to revanchism. Specifically, we highlight the capacity of housing-focused responses to homelessness to shield people from criminalisation and to prefigure and call-forth post-neoliberal practices and spaces.

中文翻译:

无家可归者治理的模棱两可:解开新自由主义城市中的关怀和复仇主义

虽然对无家可归者的“关怀”回应(例如收容所、收容所)被一些人视为与复仇主义城市的逆流,但美国最近的研究强调了新自由主义化的结构动态如何在复仇主义进程中暗示关怀空间。纪律和空间控制。在本文中,我们采用组合方法来研究澳大利亚布里斯班的关怀、复仇主义和新自由主义之间的交叉点。我们通过展示护理对新自由主义复仇主义压力的脆弱性如何在美国以外发挥作用来扩展最近研究的见解,尽管护理理性和温和的复仇主义政治占主导地位。然而,我们也超越了这种洞察力,以展示新自由主义城市中护理的持续进步潜力,尽管它容易受到复仇主义的影响。具体而言,我们强调以住房为中心的应对无家可归的能力,以保护人们免受刑事定罪,并预示和呼吁后新自由主义的做法和空间。
更新日期:2020-08-18
down
wechat
bug