Law, politics, and efficacy at the European Court of Human Rights,American Ethnologist

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › American Ethnologist › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Law, politics, and efficacy at the European Court of Human Rights
American Ethnologist ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-12 , DOI: 10.1111/amet.12971
JESSICA GREENBERG ₁

Affiliation

Why do people experience legal institutions as effective sites for political and social transformation? How do people translate political and ethical goals into modalities of law? In Europe many have responded to a widespread sense of political crisis by turning to legal remedies and judicial institutions. One of these institutions, the European Court of Human Rights, provides shared frameworks for combating people's sense of impasse or decline. People experience the Court as a successful rights institution because it shapes and generates shared semiotic forms and repertoires. Through these, lawyers, judges, and rights advocates construct and recognize their actions as efficacious. Yet the experience of efficacy is an unequally shared resource. For some, legal frameworks are the condition of possibility for ethical and professional engagement. But for others, engaging with the law produces frustration and exclusion. Moreover, engaging in judicialized politics shapes some harms as legally legible and actionable, while it shapes others as tragedies beyond reach. [law, politics, liberalism, judicialization of politics, justice, human rights, efficacy, metapragmatics, Europe]

中文翻译：

欧洲人权法院的法律，政治和效力

人们为什么将法律制度视为政治和社会转型的有效场所？人们如何将政治和道德目标转化为法律形式？在欧洲，许多人通过诉诸法律救济和司法机构来应对广泛的政治危机。这些机构之一是欧洲人权法院，为打击人们的僵局或衰落感提供了共同的框架。人们将法院视为成功的权利机构，因为它塑造并产生了共享的符号形式和曲目。通过这些，律师，法官和权利倡导者建构并认可他们的行为是有效的。然而，功效的经验是不平等共享的资源。对于某些人而言，法律框架是道德和专业参与的可能性条件。但是对于其他人而言，遵守法律会产生挫败感和排斥。此外，参与司法政治将某些危害定为法律上可辨认和可采取行动，而将其他危害定为无法企及的悲剧。[法律，政治，自由主义，政治司法化，正义，人权，效力，元语用学，欧洲]

更新日期：2020-11-12

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文